Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Unveiling AI washing: Bridging corporate technological gaps through a cognitive dissonance lens
1
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
This study utilizes Cognitive Dissonance Theory to empirically investigate how ‘AI washing’, the discrepancy between AI narratives and actual capabilities, affects the corporate technological gap. Using panel data from China's A-share listed firms (2007–2022), the findings establish a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between ‘AI washing’ and the technological gap. Mediation analysis confirms this relationship is channeled through both internal R&D investment and industry-level R&D investment. Moderation analysis reveals that strong AI-enabled participatory learning capability flattens the inverted U-curve, indicating earlier corrective action. Conversely, high investor sentiment is shown to steepen the curve. Furthermore, the nonlinear effect is subdued for firms in national AI pilot zones or high-technology-intensive industries. This research advances ‘AI washing’ literature through quantitative analysis, extends Cognitive Dissonance Theory to the domain of technology strategy, and offers empirical insights for responsible AI governance. • Applies cognitive dissonance theory to analyze AI washing's impact on the corporate technological gap. • AI washing initially widens the technological gap by stifling innovation but narrows it past a threshold as firms adapt. • Firm- and industry-level R&D investments mediate the relationship between AI washing and the technological gap. • Stronger AI knowledge absorptive and participatory learning capabilities result in a flatter inverted U-shaped curve. • Effects vary by investor sentiment, firm traits, and regulations, with persistent AI washing potentially hindering sustainable progress.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.838 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.896 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.571 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.320 Zit.
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
2018 · 3.314 Zit.