Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Breaking Bias With AI Agents
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Gender equality, recognized as Sustainable Development Goal 5 (SDG 5) by the United Nations, remains a global priority in addressing social, economic, and cultural disparities.While progress has been made, persistent challenges such as unequal access to education, workplace discrimination, safety concerns, and limited representation in leadership continue to hinder equality.Emerging technologies, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI), present innovative opportunities to accelerate progress toward this goal.This project explores the role of AI agents as practical tools for promoting gender equality through awareness, empowerment, and systemic change.AI agents can function as personalized educators, delivering interactive lessons, stories, and quizzes to dismantle stereotypes and raise awareness among students and communities.In workplaces, AI systems can analyse hiring processes, job descriptions, and salary structures to identify and mitigate gender bias, while also enabling anonymous reporting of harassment or discrimination.Safety-focused AI agents, such as multilingual chatbots and voice assistants, can provide real-time support for women in vulnerable situations by connecting them to resources and trusted contacts.Additionally, AI-driven platforms can serve policymakers by collecting and analyzing gender-related data, generating insights to inform inclusive policies.This initiative emphasizes the dual role of AI agents as both awareness-builders and change-enablers.By combining education, empowerment, and accountability, AI has the potential to address structural inequalities and create inclusive environments.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization
2017 · 20.576 Zit.
Generative Adversarial Nets
2023 · 19.892 Zit.
Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks
2014 · 15.300 Zit.
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.396 Zit.
On a Method to Measure Supervised Multiclass Model’s Interpretability: Application to Degradation Diagnosis (Short Paper)
2024 · 13.164 Zit.