Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
An An Ethical Framework for Mitigating AI Algorithmic Bias in Information Resource Development
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract This opinion paper takes up the crucial topic of algorithmic bias for AI powered collection development, asserting that these biases have the potential to create disparities, stifle intellectual openness and undermine principles in academic libraries. The paper’s novel contributions lies in the development of a library-specific ethical framework within collection development processes rather than treating ethics as abstract principles. By examining algorithmic bias through data selection, model design, and institutional governance, the paper proposes mitigation strategies grounded in library and information science and librarianship. The paper proposes a framework to mitigate algorithmic bias in collection development through transparency in AI modelling, encouraging systematic collection of diverse data inputs, ensuring there are appropriate audit mechanisms developed and creating a culture of ethical AI literacy for library professionals. The paper argues for a forward-looking, user-based approach to using AI in collection development that ssupports rather than undermine intellectual freedom, equity, and inclusivity. Keywords: Algorithm Bias; Artificial Intelligence; Collection Development; Ethical Framework; Information resources; Academic Libraries.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller
1999 · 5.632 Zit.
An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller
1975 · 5.568 Zit.
A FRAMEWORK FOR REPRESENTING KNOWLEDGE
1988 · 4.551 Zit.
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy
2023 · 3.395 Zit.