Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can ChatGPT Do That Job?
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
This article examines two connected projects that positioned students as active participants in their engagement with large language model chatbots. In one, students acted as evaluators, testing chatbots in assigned educational roles and reflecting on their strengths and limitations. In the second, students acted as builders, designing custom bots for specific purposes and exchanging feedback with peers. Across both, the emphasis was on student-centered learning, where learners were not passive users of technology but decision-makers shaping its applications. The findings suggest broader relevance beyond higher education. The evaluator–builder dynamic offers a framework for adult learning and workplace training, where employees can benefit from opportunities to evaluate existing tools, build simple role-based versions for their own tasks, and reflect on outcomes alongside ethical concerns. These projects suggest that effectiveness, in both classrooms and workplaces, may depend less on technical capability alone and more on how learners are empowered to engage with, adapt, and take responsibility for these tools.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller
1999 · 5.632 Zit.
An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller
1975 · 5.575 Zit.
A FRAMEWORK FOR REPRESENTING KNOWLEDGE
1988 · 4.551 Zit.
Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy
2023 · 3.410 Zit.