Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Additional file 1 of The landscape of artificial intelligence tools and platforms for evidence synthesis: a scoping review
0
Zitationen
7
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Supplementary Table S1 – Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Reporting Guidelines [1]. Supplementary Table S2 – Data Extraction Form. Supplementary Table S3 – Included and Excluded Studies Reference Lists (with reasons for exclusion). Supplementary Table S4 – Global AI tools and platforms being developed and/or implemented for ES steps automation. Supplementary Findings: Regional Specialisation – Findings per Region and Country. I – Asia-Pacific. II – Europe. III – Middle-East. IV – North America. V – South America. Supplementary Discussion: Barriers and Facilitators to AI Tools and Platforms Development and Implementation. I – ES Planning and Protocol Writing. II – Search. III – Screening and Selection. IV – Reference Management and De-duplication. V – Data Extraction. VI – Critical Quality Appraisal. VII – Summary/ Synthesis, Updating and Dissemination.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 87.796 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.960 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.481 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.191 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.871 Zit.