Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Predictive policing and predictive justice: Ethics, data protection, and the AI act
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
In the latest years, there has been an increasing tingrend for police forces and judicial authorities to employ predictive profiling technologies in justice and law enforcement, posing major risks to fundamental rights of citizens. These systems create ontologies, perform risk assessment, and even predict the probability of re-offense. However, there is a lack of transparency in how those systems are trained, tested, validated and employed, and research has shown that they are biased against marginalized groups. The EU Artificial Intelligence Act, by introducing a new legal basis for the processing of special categories of personal data without appropriate safeguards, and without a coherent legal framework with the Law Enforcement Directive, creates a source of potential issues detrimental to data subjects’ rights and freedoms. This article explores the intersection between the AI Act and the LED Directive, highlighting gaps and inconsistencies in the related legal framework.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.620 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.876 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.435 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.293 Zit.
Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
1987 · 3.184 Zit.