Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
AI-Enabled Academic Administration and Process Optimization in Higher Education Institutions
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
This conceptual paper explored the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to optimize administrative processes in higher education. Its purpose is threefold: to review current literature on AI applications in university administration, to propose a conceptual framework for process optimization, and to outline the institutional and ethical conditions necessary for responsible adoption. Drawing on an integrative literature review and conceptual analysis, the study synthesizes insights from educational technology, organizational theory, and digital ethics to construct a four-part framework comprising transactional automation, predictive intelligence, conversational service, and strategic governance. Each dimension addresses specific sources of administrative friction—workflow inefficiency, delayed decision-making, information inaccessibility, and institutional misalignment—while collectively supporting coherent, data-informed, and human-centered operations. The framework emphasizes that AI is not a stand-alone solution; meaningful gains require alignment with process redesign, data interoperability, iterative implementation, and robust human oversight. Ethical and organizational risks—including algorithmic bias, privacy and surveillance concerns, deskilling, and strategic distraction—are highlighted, reinforcing the necessity of transparency, accountability, and governance structures in implementation. By positioning AI as a layered capability rather than a set of isolated tools, the framework provides higher education institutions with guidance for deploying AI responsibly, ensuring that efficiency improvements are accompanied by fairness, student-centeredness, and institutional legitimacy. The study contributes both a theoretical lens and practical implications for administrators, policymakers, and institutional planners aiming to integrate AI into academic administration thoughtfully and strategically.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.786 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.893 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.541 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.314 Zit.
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
2018 · 3.259 Zit.