Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A Discordance-Aware Multimodal Framework with Multi-Agent Clinical Reasoning
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis frequently exhibits discordance between structural damage observed in imaging and patient-reported symptoms such as pain. This mismatch complicates clinical interpretation and patient stratification and remains insufficiently modeled in existing decision support systems. We propose a discordance aware multimodal framework that combines machine learning prediction models with a tool grounded multi agent reasoning system. Using baseline data from the FNIH Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium, we trained multimodal models to predict two progression tasks, joint space loss only progression versus non progression, and pain only progression versus non progression. The predictive system integrates three modality specific experts: a CatBoost tabular model using demographic, radiographic, MRI-derived scalar, and biomarker features; MRI image embeddings extracted using a ResNet18 backbone; and Xray embeddings derived from the same architecture. Expert predictions are fused using a stacking ensemble. Residual based models estimate expected pain from structural features, enabling the computation of a pain structure discordance score between observed and expected symptoms. A multi-agent reasoning layer interprets these signals to assign clinically interpretable OA phenotypes and generate phenotype specific management recommendations.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.830 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.565 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 9.000 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.628 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.176 Zit.