Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Generative AI in the hands of candidates: Implications for our assessment practice
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
It is not hard to find discussions about how Generative AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude have transformed the way we work. But we see much less attention given to how it has disrupted the processes involved with gaining work. And yet, many talent acquisition leaders are grappling with seemingly AI-generated cover letters and resumes and responses to interview questions that all the same. How should they respond? On the one hand, candidates using AI to help get a job feels a bit like cheating. But on the other hand, if we are to undertake work with AI in the future, then should we not reward candidates who use it to get a job? In this session, Patrick will first provide an overview of the capabilities of AI tools, and then some insights from his research into how others in Talent Acquisition leaders are reacting to it. He will conclude the presentation with some thoughts about how employers can try to manage the phenomenon. Fair warning: there are no clear answers out there for the “how” yet, and the pros and cons can be discussed after the presentation.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.626 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.532 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.046 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.843 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.