Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Do Early Career Researchers Consider <scp>AI</scp> as an Opportunity or a Threat? A Pathfinding Study
0
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
ABSTRACT The article presents the latest (2025) iteration of the Harbingers longitudinal project on early career researchers (ECRs), artificial intelligence (AI) and scholarly communications. In conversation with a purposive and diverse sample of more than 60 ECRs in six countries and numerous subjects, we present an evaluation of a pressing issue: what impact will AI have on their work and career? An important issue is that widespread media speculation suggests that it is entry‐level positions that will be hit hardest by AI. While ECRs were asked 50 plus questions during interviews, none were directly asked about changes to job security and employment prospects, yet much of relevance was volunteered in answering related AI questions. Adding a new methodological dimension to the Harbingers project, we employed AI (NotebookLM) for an initial qualitative analysis of the interview data, with findings reviewed and corrected by the national interviewers. We conclude that AI is a double‐edged sword which has huge potential as well as posing significant challenges. The AI‐assisted analysis proved effective at identifying broad themes, though human oversight was essential to capture nuance, differences between cohorts, and unusual cases. Finally, given that we were working with a select and relatively small sample to inform a larger study, the data should be seen as illuminating and filling a research lacuna, rather than a definitive result in a fast‐changing field.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
2019 · 32.196 Zit.
Techniques to Identify Themes
2003 · 5.414 Zit.
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
2007 · 4.116 Zit.
Basic Content Analysis
1990 · 4.045 Zit.
Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts
2013 · 3.123 Zit.