Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Assessing ChatGPT’s responses to office ergonomics and spine health questions
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess ChatGPT's responses to common office ergonomics and spine health questions. ChatGPT was asked the 50 most frequent questions about 'office ergonomics and spine health' and evaluated by 10 experts on a scale of 1-4 points. The consistency between the experts' ratings was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Flesch-Kincaid reading level was used to evaluate the readability of answers. The results indicated that ChatGPT demonstrated the capacity to provide generally satisfactory information concerning ergonomics and spinal health in office workers, with good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.838) as well as a readability level equivalent to a middle school level. This study indicated that although the responses were considered adequate, that they cannot replace experts' clinical judgment, particularly in the personalization of exercise prescriptions and the provision of individualized and comprehensive approaches.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.719 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.628 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.176 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.880 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.