Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Assessing the Utility of AI Versus Human-Created MCQs in Pediatric Medical Education
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Generative AI in its current form cannot yet match human expertise in producing consistently high-quality MCQs for pediatrics. However, AI shows potential as a supplementary tool, particularly within hybrid human-AI workflows that combine efficiency with expert oversight. These findings highlight both the opportunities and limitations of AI in medical education assessment and underscore the importance of balancing reliability, validity, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness when integrating AI into assessment design.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.422 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.300 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.734 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.519 Zit.